Posts Tagged Gun Control
Is that a gun in your pants, or are you just happy to see me…
Posted by zoboxrox in Uncategorized, crime, politics on July 24th, 2009

How many senators does it take to screw in a light bulb? Of course the answer is 60 — and thank god for that. The Senate narrowly rejected an ammendment (which has to be approved by 60 votes — not a majority of 50+) attached to the new defense bill which would have allowed people to travel between states with concealed weapons, no matter the laws in the states to which they are traveling. In other words, anyone who has a gun permit, which is about as easy to get these days as a driver’s license in some places, could legally carry their hidden firearm on the streets of your home town, no matter what your local laws dictate.
My home town happens to be New York City, and I am so grateful to the two dissenting Republican Senators Richard Lugar of Indiana and George Voinovich of Ohio, because while its one thing to have a gun in your house, it is entirely different to bring it out with you at night. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO A BAR?!?!? There are so many morons out there (see below)… adding weapons to idiocy is never smart.

400 big city mayors, who came together to form Mayors Against Illegal Guns, agreed with me, including my own, Dictator Bloomberg, and sent a letter to the Senate pleading with them to come to their goddamn senses not to pass the bill. While this is clearly a case of the Federal Government imposing itself on State’s Rights, which is like, the main platform for conservatives these days, it was of course a Republican sponsored and supported bill.
The debate forced senators to wrestle with issues of states rights, sometimes in ways that seemed to clash with the general philosophies of their parties. Many Republicans, who typically favor limiting the ability of the federal government to dictate to states on social issues, voted in this case to limit the ability of states to insist on their own rules for concealed weapons carried by people from other states.
That said, however, 20 democrats also voted for the bill (NOT including my new Senator, Kristen Gillibrand, who was previously considered gun friendly but voted with her brain this time around). Why do people think this is a good idea? I know the argument – 
– but it doesn’t sit well with me. Is the good of the one really more important than the good of the many? Do we really live in a state of such fear that we generally feel a need to arm ourselves at all times? Maybe if we fixed the broken things in this country — health care, the economy, the middle-class — crime wouldn’t consume our streets. Is adding weapons really the answer to the problem?
Guns Don’t Kill People - Bombs are much more effective

If anyone is wondering why liberals press for stronger gun control, I think the events of the past two weeks paint a pretty clear picture.
Perhaps it is related to the penchant for ultra-right wing conservatives to turn to violence as means of expression. At least lefty lunatics are mostly non-violent, even if they are smelly… or happy… or whatever it is that makes them so frightening to conservatives. While there are certainly some exceptions to this rule (The Revolutionary War, The Civil War, and World War II were all fought for progressive causes or against fascist ones. In addition, members of certain civil rights groups, such as the SDS or the Black Panter Party, occasionally resorted to violence in the 1960s) it is overwhelmingly evident that “there is a dangerous and virulent streak of violence and fascism in American conservatism, now and throughout our country’s history,” (Lux). For Christ’s sake, Dick Cheney shoots his own friends!
The murder of Dr. George Tiller reminded those of us who forgot to live in fear, that the fringe cannot be reasoned with. The more recent shooting at the Holocaust Museum, which killed security guard Steven Johns, reinstated the fact that the deadliest terror occurring on our soil today is home-grown and right-wing. Its all just so ironic and hypocritical, in the end, it fits perfectly into the disintegration of the Republican Party — most conservatives I know don’t want to be associated with violence and murder. It doesn’t look good in alumni magazines.
Here are some other examples:
- The Oklahoma City Bombing - April 19, 1995; Right-wing American terrorist Timothy McVeigh, destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, claiming the lives of 168 victims and injuring more than 680. The blast destroyed or damaged 324 buildings in a sixteen-block radius.
- The Centennial Olympic Park Bombing - July 27, 1996 in Atlanta, Georgia; 1996 Summer Olympics, committed by Eric Robert Rudolph, former explosives expert for the United States Army and active member of the Army of God. Two people died, and 111 were injured.
- The Ku Klux Klan, The Army of God, The National Alliance,
- The assassinations of President Abraham Lincoln, President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King

The Second Amendment in all its Glory.
Posted by zoboxrox in crime, human rights, malfunction, politics, tragedy on October 27th, 2008
So, I’ve always been a news junkie and now, with this election approaching, I can barely go ten minutes without checking for updates. Generally I skip over a lot of the local-type stories. For example, while the death of four high school cheerleaders in a firey car wreck is a nightmare for everyone involved even at a remote level, it does not actually change the daily lives of most people in this country. My mother always says, “No news is good news,” and while I don’t subscribe to that specific belief, of course I understand what she’s saying
So when I first saw the caption, “8 year old shoots self with Uzi, dies,” I felt a little peeved at CNN.com’s supposed carelessness in turning a personal family tragedy into an eye-popping, mouse-clicking headline. I decided, despite my judgement, to read the article. As opposed to the pervy, voyeur feeling I usually get when I finish this sensationalist type of column, I felt instead a deep anger, and not with CNN, but over the fact that this kind of thing would ever have been allowed to occur in the first place.
The boy was with a certified instructor and “was shooting the weapon down range when the force of the weapon made it travel up and back toward his head, where he suffered the injury,” a police statement said. Police called it a “self-inflicted accidental shooting.”
Why was the eight year old boy shooting the Uzi at the gun show? Mostly because it is “legal and fun,” which is how the Westfield’s Sportsmans Club defines its Machine Gun Shoot and Firearms Expo that was held this past Sunday. But what is really so much fun about shooting an automatic weapon? And how can this be legal, when so many other things are not (ex. gay marriage)? These are two things I’ve never really understood.
The following is the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights:
- Second Amendment; Right to Keep and Bear Arms
- A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
That’s it. That one little phrase is the basis for such organizations as the NRA and publications like Guns and Ammo, which both not only promote gun ownership, but also help elect politicians through fund-raising, endorsements, and propaganda. In fact, if you watch NRA news on their website, a pundit openly blasts Obama for his statement, “I’m concerned about allowing loaded fire-arms into family oriented spaces,” as if that’s an outrageous statement to make.
This story, though perhaps not as imminent as the Presidential Election, is in no way local. Instead, it brings to front one of the most pressing political ironies of our time and that is this: Even though the Republican Party has demonstrated a clear lack of regard for the safety of children, fighting for gun rights to an almost unlimited extent, they are still considered the family oriented party.
The GOP loves to argue that having an unlocked loaded weapon is the safest way to protect one’s family against home invasions. Good argument, but let’s look at some statistics about gun violence and children.
- In 2005, 1,972 children and teenagers were murdered with guns, 822 committed suicide with guns, and 173 died in unintentional shootings. Twenty-one were killed in a police intervention, and another 39 died, but the intent was not known. A total of 3,027 young people were killed by firearms in the U.S.
- In 2005, 81% of murder victims aged 12 to 24 years old were killed with a firearm.
- Firearms are the second-leading cause of death (after motor vehicle accidents) for young people ages 1-19 in the U.S.
- The rate of firearm death of under 14-years-old is nearly 12 times higher in the U.S. than in 25 other industrialized countries combined.
- In one year, for every child and teenager killed by a gun, nearly six were estimated to be non-fatally wounded.
- In 2005, firearms were responsible for 17% of injury deaths for Caucasian teens ages 13-19 in the United States, 52% of deaths for African-American teens, 22% of Native American/Alaska Native teens, and 19% of Asian/Pacific Islander teens.
My problem with the pro-gun movement is not that they interpret the Second Amendment incorrectly, my problem is that they insist upon celebrating an entity which is, by nature, a machine for killing. While responsible gun ownership is more or less a private matter (like gay marriage), public expos for automatic weapons seems a little extreme, and when children are brought into them, downright insane. And if we examine the recent past, it becomes clear that this culture of gun-worship can never lead anywhere positive.



Recent Comments