Eating Dog No Different Than Eating Pig February 8, 2010
In the NY Times last week there was an Op-Ed on the outraged reaction so many people give when they hear about the consumption of dog. In many countries eating dog is considered a delicacy. In the U.S.A. dogs are pets and therefore not an animal that we consume. Other cultures don’t feel so emotionally connected to the animals and find them socially acceptable to eat.
The Op-Ed tells us about some pending legislation in China:
As it happened, our meal came shortly before the eruption of a furious online debate in China over a proposed “anti-animal maltreatment” law that would outlaw the eating and selling of dog and cat meat, making it punishable by fines of more than $700 and 15 days of detention.
But seriously, how can it not be hypocrisy to say that killing dogs is bad but killing pigs or chickens or cows is fine. Are dogs and cats superior in some way that makes them above eating? We share our homes with them. Is that a good enough reason? Some people share their homes with a pig. Did George Clooney stop eating bacon while sharing his home with his companion pig? For a vegetarian or vegan, all animals are superior and should not be eaten. But does an omnivore have a leg to stand on when they take an ethical position against the eating of companion animals? In my opinion, no.
The Op-Ed had this to say about it:
However I cannot see a rational argument for saying eating dogs or cats is barbaric while eating pork or beef is fine. If you eat meat you cannot logically find it morally or ethically repugnant to eat a particular meat.
Basically, it’s saying put up or shut up. Be a vegetarian or stop being so hypocritical when making racist remarks about how horrible it is that people in other countries and cultures eat dogs and cats. If you wouldn’t eat your cat, but you would eat a farmed animal, well, your simmering daily in hypocrisy. Your comments are not only racist, but also specieist.







